Skip to main content

Sola Scriptura: Standing Firm in an Age of Compromise

In an age of self-help theology, celebrity pastors, and doctrinal buffet lines, the church must return to the bedrock of its faith: Scripture alone. Sola Scriptura is not just a Reformation slogan; it is a lifeline. It means the Bible is our highest authority—above tradition, personal experience, public opinion, or denominational decrees.

But we live in a time when many professing Christians treat the Bible as optional. It's a reference point, not a rule. A suggestion, not a standard. We quote it when convenient and ignore it when it convicts. We ask for God’s voice but neglect the one place He has already spoken clearly.

Scripture is not a collection of ancient moral tales—it is the living, breathing Word of God. "All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness" (2 Timothy 3:16). In other words, it’s not one voice among many—it is the voice. It corrects us when we’re wrong. It trains us to live rightly. It is the straightedge by which all other lines are measured.

When we abandon Sola Scriptura, we don’t just open the door to bad theology—we surrender the right to call anything true or false at all. Truth becomes subjective, authority becomes fluid, and Christianity becomes nothing more than a spiritualized version of cultural trends. This is how false teachers flourish: when the people of God no longer know the Word of God.

God has never left His people without guidance. From the tablets at Sinai to the letters of Paul, from the Psalms of David to the Gospels of Christ—He has revealed His character, His will, and His promises in written form. The Scriptures are sufficient. They are not exhaustive of all knowledge, but they are complete for all godliness. "His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness" (2 Peter 1:3). That means we don’t need new revelations—we need deeper roots in what has already been revealed.

This doesn’t mean we disregard wisdom, scholarship, or church history. But all of these are subordinate to Scripture. If a theologian contradicts the Word, he is wrong. If a tradition undermines the Word, it must be discarded. If a pastor adds to the Word, he must be rebuked.

Standing on Scripture alone is not a position of arrogance—it is a position of submission. It means we trust God’s wisdom over our own. It means we anchor our lives to something eternal in a culture addicted to novelty. And it means we measure all teaching, all behavior, and all spiritual experience by the unchanging standard of God's Word.

In a world full of shifting sand, we need the solid rock of truth. Sola Scriptura is not just a doctrine—it is a declaration: God has spoken, and His Word is enough.

The question is not whether Scripture is clear or sufficient. The question is whether we will be faithful to it. The future of the church doesn’t rest on its creativity or charisma. It rests on its conviction that Scripture is still the final word.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The OBBBA: The Great, The Good, and The Disappointing

  As of the time that I am writing this the House appears set to approve the final provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. President Donald Trump appears set to secure his landmark legislative achievement 164 days since the commencement of his second term. There is no doubt that this piece of legislation will be the centerpiece of his presidency, likely surpassing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in his future presidential biographies. Although I have not been shy in recent days critiquing specific provisions of the bill, I do wholeheartedly believe that on net, the OBBBA will be a positive step for the United States of America and should be applauded. However, in a 940-page bill, in a Congress with the narrowest of majorities, from a Republican Party that has become a broad coalition of anti-leftist, oftentimes contradicting, interests, that there will be provisions that pass that aren’t ideal. Nevertheless, let’s breakdown the One Big Beautiful Bill Act with the great, the goo...
Post a Comment
Read more

I'm Proud To Be An American

It is a strange thing to be born into a nation that both saves and sins. Stranger still to love it. Stranger still, perhaps, not to. In April of 1945, U.S. soldiers liberated Buchenwald. What they found—bodies stacked like cordwood, children too weak to stand—shattered the postwar illusion that history had been moving gradually toward progress. It was a revelation not just of evil, but of its capability to flourish in silence. The United States did not discover evil in Europe. But it confronted it. And more importantly, it resolved to restrain it—not through imperial dominion, but through the creation of institutions, alliances, and post-war norms built on ideas. That moment—when force was met with order, when liberty stared down nihilism—is one of many reasons I am proud to be an American. Because to be an American is not merely to occupy land within borders. It is to be formed by a proposition. And to be responsible for it.
Post a Comment
Read more

Deportation Isn’t Genocide. Let’s Stop Pretending It Is

Lately, I’ve been seeing a lot of people compare President Trump’s deportation efforts to Nazi Germany. Honestly, it’s getting out of hand. It’s not just inaccurate—it’s offensive, too. This isn’t about politics for me. It’s about facts. We can’t let our emotions run wild and twist reality. Deportation is not the same thing as genocide. Not even close. Let’s Start With the Basics Deportation isn’t some new, cruel invention. It didn’t start with Trump. It didn’t start with Bush. It didn’t even start with Obama—although, for the record, Obama deported more people than any president in U.S. history. Millions. He was literally called the “Deporter-in-Chief” by immigration activists. But suddenly now, when Trump talks about deportation, it’s being painted as the start of a fascist regime? Come on. There’s a difference between disliking a policy and misrepresenting it completely. You can be against deportations. That’s fine. But calling it “Nazi-like” is not just wrong—it’s ridiculous. Histo...
Post a Comment
Read more